Clinical Research
Clinical Research Papers
Corresponding Arterial
Compliance and Pulse Pressure Measurements During 24-Hour
Ambulatory Monitoring
Brinton TJ, Neutel JM, Walls ED, Chio
S-S, Tai L-C, Franklin SS, Smith DHG, Weber MA, UCI, Orange, CA,
and Pulse Metric, Inc., San Diego, CA.
Monitoring
simultaneous arterial compliance (C, ml/mmHg) and blood pressure
(BP) measurements during a twenty-four hour period would be quite
useful in understanding BP regulation and vascular function.
However, due to the co-dependent nature of the C and BP
relationship, understanding the results of monitoring sessions is
complicated, especially in patients with underlying
cardiovascular disease. In order to evaluate this relationship,
14 patients ranging from 30 to 80 (mean±
SEM, 53± 4 years) underwent 24-hour
ambulatory C and BP monitoring with the DynaPulse 5000A. This new
non-invasive technology provides simultaneous measurements of C
and BP by analysis of the oscillometric waveform. Natural
circadian BP variations provided the opportunity to evaluate C
without pharmacological intervention. C measurements were derived
at mean arterial (MAP) (near end-systolic) during the cardiac
cycle.
| Independent Factors |
|
PP |
MAP |
DBP |
BSA |
AGE |
| STD COEF |
-0.710 |
-0.362 |
0.288 |
0.501 |
0.153 |
0.153 |
| p value (2 tail) |
P<0.00l |
p<0.001 |
P<0.00l |
p<0.001 |
p<0.001 |
p<0.001 |
Multivariate stepwise regression analysis was performed to
evaluate the effect of several independent factors on C in 798
total individual measurements (TABLE). In addition, each patient
demonstrated a significant linear correlation for the C vs. pulse
pressure (PP) relationship during ambulatory monitoring, average
r = -0.79. Results suggest that besides MAP, pulse pressure is a
strong inverse determinant of C. Due to the relationship between
C and PP, differences in C in patients with matched PP may be a
valuable measure of possible underlying cardiovascular disease.
*Presented at the American Society of
Hypertension 11th Annual Scientific Meetings, 1996 (see American
Journal of Hypertension, 1996 Vol 9, No.4, Part 2, pg. 56A).
|